After posting the last post, and going back and tagging it and the original Emily Rose post, I thought about how funny it is to have a ‘Satan’ tag. Is it just me? There just seemed to be no tag more appropriate.
[ This posting was written about a month ago (around 9/12) … I just ran out of things to write about, so I’m publishing this ]
I came across this article this morning. It seems that The Exorcism of Emily Rose has struck a chord with people (at least as far as getting them in the theater) as it grossed $30.2M over the weekend making it the third largest September opening ever, despite reviews that pretty much mirror mine.
Apparently I’m not the only one interested in the concept of exorcism — which makes me feel much more normal. 😉
Given the box office numbers though, I’m inclined to wonder what makes these types of movies so attractive to people that they have to go see it? I think that those who were raised hearing about how Satan and demons were the cause of everything bad are more inclined to go see them just out of the curiosity raised through years of hearing about it ad nauseum and finally being able to see something that was supposedly “true”. I think that I really like seeing other peoples interpretation of this phenomenon and the events that surround them.
Just to be clear, I do not believe in actual demonic possession. I do believe, however, that other people believe in it — and can believe in it so much that they can manifest behavior consistent with it if they do not learn to deal with the guilt instilled in them while being initiated, as a child or as an adult, into a religious group in which a fear of Satan forms much of the cornerstone of the doctrine that is taught.
Much of the above is why I also enjoyed the second season of Millennium so much this time around, while “not getting it” when it was actually on TV. Much of the content was around religious beliefs and the fulfilling of prophecy as believed by the “Millennium Group”. A lot of it had to do with what the Millennium Group was doing in order to ensure the outcomes that they believed would signal the end of the world. For some reason the second time around, that really intrigued me.
The second season of the show was quite different than the first. From what I have heard on interviews on the sets, Chris Carter became very busy with the X Files during the second season of Millennium and gave control over to Glenn Morgan and James Wong. The show became quite different than the first season, focusing on the Millennium Group and quite a bit of its religious philosophy and apocalyptic beliefs. Many of the shows took on an almost surreal atmosphere, very unrealistic and “out there”. One episode specifically (I can’t remember the episode but it was towards the end of the season) had very much of a “Natural Born Killers” feel to it — very random and disjointed.
Season Three, which we started watching (we got through almost 3 discs), feels like a melding of Season 1 and Season 2. There is quite a bit of the religious and / or spiritual aspects to what we’ve seen so far, however it is much less surreal than Season 2, getting “back to the basics” of what made the first season so great.
I’m still a little disconnected from Season 3 as compared to Season 1, but I am still enjoying the shows.
Who knew that the Vatican had an exorcist convention? For some reason, this struck me as funny this morning.
Yesterday we went to see The Exorcism of Emily Rose, a movie based on the true story of a woman named Anneliese Michel, who died during a rite of exorcism. Her parents and the priests that performed the exorcism were charged with negligence and failure to provide first aid.
The movie tells the story of Emily Rose as a series of flashbacks taking place during the trial of the priest who performed the exorcism. The priest is persistent that he wants to be able to tell “Emily’s story” while the arch-diocese does not want him to testify, as they do not want to be embarrassed by the trial.
I wouldn’t characterize the movie as bad, but it is definitely something I would wait for video to see it. I think, for me, anything having to do with exorcism has always interested me, so I really wanted to see it. If you are expecting something along the lines of the outrageousness in The Exorcist, you’ll definitely be disappointed. This movie is not over the top at all and the trial story line is rather plodding.
Overall I think I liked the movie. I say ‘I think’ because I am normally quite polarized when I dislike a movie and get pissed when I’ve wasted my time on something that I didn’t like (Disclosure was one of those movies — after reading the book I saw the movie and was completely irritated at how they ruined the story that was so well told in the book).
When I walked out of this movie, I wasn’t irritated. I wasn’t real excited either. I just didn’t think it was necessarily a waste of time. It’s definitely not a movie to write home about, but it would make a good rental.
As I said earlier, its not The Exorcist and if thats what your looking for don’t waste your time. If you want to see a story that is “based on a true story” on the subject, wait for rental.